Hackard Law - Estate Planning
Call for free initial consultation.


We speak Spanish and Russian.

How to Prove Elder Financial Abuse in California

Proving Elder Financial Abuse in California.jpg

California financial elder abuse claims have exploded in the last couple of years. Success in civil courts on these claims is dependent upon proof. So how do you prove a financial elder abuse claim when the victim (the elder) has died?

We start with the factual elements of a claim. California jury instructions provide a guide for these elements. That said, it is recognized that even these instructions are not intended to cover every circumstance in which a plaintiff may bring a cause of action under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act. In a general sense, factual elements begin with showing: that an individual (and/or his/her assistant) took/hid/appropriated/obtained/ [or] took the decedent's property; the victim (the decedent) was 65 years of age or older; the taking was for a wrongful use with the intent to defraud or by undue influence; and the decedent was harmed.

To find liability, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of evidence to a judge or jury that the defendant committed financial elder abuse. Once this standard is met, the court "shall award to the plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs."

The simplest way to explain preponderance of evidence is that the evidence on one side outweighs the evidence on the other side. In civil trial, the plaintiff is only required to prove only that something is more likely to be true than not true. There are higher standards of proof when punitive damages are sought.

As a practical matter, wrongdoers have a big credibility gap to overcome. They may have an uphill battle in showing positive facts in the abuser's evidence column.

If you have a financial elder abuse claim against a wrongdoer and would like to discuss your options, give us a call at Hackard Law at (916) 313-3030.

Proving Elder Financial Abuse in CA from Hackard Law on Vimeo.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Rated By Super Lawyers Michael A.Hackard SuperLawyers.com AV PREEMINENT Martindale-Hubbell Lawyer Ratings Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb Top Attorney Litigation Million Dollar Advocates Forum Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum Top Attorneys In Sacramento Lead Counsel | LC | Rated Hackard Law A Professional Law Corporation BBB Business Review Best Real Estate
Lawyers in

*AV Preeminent is a certification mark of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters.